Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Public Finance Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gravelle, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Zimmerman, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Tax Progressivity and the Design of Tax Incentives for Investment

Jane G. Gravelle

Cengressional Research Service

Dennis Zimmerman

Cengressional Research Service

This article uses marginal tax rate analysis to simulate the effect of our complex system of capital income taxation on of tertax returns by asset type and on tax progressivity. Preferential taxation is found to favor higher income individuals, causing returns to decline less steeply across the rate brackets, For any level of subsidy, the benefits to higher income investors are less pronounced when credits rather than deductions are used, suggesting that tax subsidies can be designed to reallocate investment without heavily favoring wealthy individuals. With leveraging, aftertax returns rise across the tax brackets for preferentially treated assets, suggesting the current tax rules produce regressive rather than progressive tax rates on capital income. The tax advantages of leveraging to high-bracket taxpayers persist when risk is introduced, as yield rises proportionally more than risk at high tax rates. Allowing for risk aversion also indicates that the timing of tax benefits affects an asset's riskiness, suggesting that tax subsidies can be designed both to achieve distributional objectives and to minimize private riskiness.

Public Finance Review, Vol. 12, No. 3, 251-289 (1984)
DOI: 10.1177/109114218401200301


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?