This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pogodzinski, J.M. Articles by Sjoquist, D. L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

A Note On the Estimation of Capitalization

San Jose State University

David L. Sjoquist

Georgia State University

Several authors have applied the hedonic model using before-after data to estimate the willingness to pay for a change in public expenditure or amenity This article shows that attempts to interpret the results of such estimation as a measure of willingness to pay for a local amenity or public expenditure in this case are flawed. The implicit basis for such estimation is a single-jurisdiction partial equilibrium model, whereas the underlying Tiebout model is multijurisdictional and general equilibrium. It is argued that the results of such estimations incorporate biases, the direction and magnitude of which cannot be predicted. If service-tax packages are exogenous, then the hedonic model using before-after data will likely provide incorrect estimates of the willingness to pay.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?