Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Public Finance Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Archibald, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Pereira, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Effects of Public and Private R&D on Private-Sector Performance in the United States

Robert B. Archibald

College of William and Mary

Alfredo M. Pereira

College of William and Mary

This study analyzes the effects of public and private research and development (R&D) on private-sector output, employment, and investment using a multivariate time-series approach. This approach follows the conceptual argument that dynamic feedbacks are essential to understanding the relationship between public-funded R&D and private-sector performance. With this approach, the authors are able to measure the total effects of public and private R&D on private output. The results suggest that in the long term, public R&D does not affect employment but crowds in private investment, whereas private R&D is a substitute for both. As a consequence, the long-term effects of public R&D on output are positive and substantial, whereas the effects of private R&D are at best marginally positive. As a corollary, the authors argue that public R&D should be brought into the limelight as a leading candidate for explaining the growth slowdown in the past decades.

Key Words: Private R&D • public R&D • economic performance

Public Finance Review, Vol. 31, No. 4, 429-451 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/1091142103031004005


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?