This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Lacombe, D. J. Articles by Shaughnessy, T. M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Accounting for Spatial Error Correlation in the 2004 Presidential Popular Vote

Ohio University

Timothy M. Shaughnessy

LSU in Shreveport

One problem with describing election vote shares using ordinary least squares (OLS) is that it ignores the possible presence of spatial error correlation, whereby the errors are correlated in a systematic manner over space. This omission can bias OLS standard errors. We examine the 2004 presidential county vote outcome using OLS and a spatial error model (SEM) that accounts for spatial autocorrelation in the error structure. We find that spatial error correlation is present, that the SEM is superior to OLS for making inferences, and that several factors deemed important to the 2004 election outcome are not significant once the spatial error autocorrelation is taken into account.

Key Words: spatial econometrics • spatial error model • presidential election

Public Finance Review, Vol. 35, No. 4, 480-499 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1091142106295768


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. J. Franzese Jr and J. C. Hays Interdependence in Comparative Politics: Substance, Theory, Empirics, Substance Comparative Political Studies, April 1, 2008; 41(4-5): 742 - 780. [Abstract] [PDF]