This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Clotfelter, C. T. Articles by Vigdor, J. L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Teacher Bonuses and Teacher Retention in Low-Performing Schools

Evidence from the North Carolina $1,800 Teacher Bonus Program

Duke University

Elizabeth J. Glennie

Duke University

Helen F. Ladd

Duke University

Jacob L. Vigdor

Duke University

Between 2001 and 2004, the state of North Carolina gave an annual salary bonus of $1,800 to certified math, science, and special education teachers in a set of low-performing and/or high-poverty secondary schools. Eligible teachers were to continue receiving the bonus as long as they continued in the school. In a survey of teachers and principals, the authors find evidence that school personnel favor the use of monetary incentives to increase the attractiveness of their workplace but were skeptical that the amount of the bonus would be sufficient to reduce the high turnover rates in their schools. Preliminary evidence on turnover rates supports this skepticism. Given that the survey evidence reveals widespread misunderstanding of the retention incentives incorporated into the program, the authors conclude that the bonus program was hampered by a series of flaws in design and implementation.

Key Words: turnover • salaries • compensating differential

Public Finance Review, Vol. 36, No. 1, 63-87 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1091142106291662


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?